Wednesday, June 27, 2007

SIPA UK: Real Live Personal Relationships Remain Key to Business Success


LONDON – OK, so getting here was less than smooth. A flight delay had me amusing myself in Philadelphia International to well past midnight. I kept saying to myself: it could be worse; they could be asking me to listen to country music. Apparently I said this aloud. The person next to me was a Toby Keith fan. I changed seats.

Then I realized that Gatwick airport is about as far from my intended hotel as Philadelphia is from my intended hotel. But fortunately, the taxi driver made the long drive seem much . . . well . . . longer. Apparently he was uncomfortable with silence. Apparently he doesn’t have teenage daughters. Apparently sticking my head out the window only signaled to him that I wanted his views on cell phones, child rearing and Israel.

When I arrived at the Grange Holborn Hotel for the meeting, I figured I was all set. Nice place. Nice people. And a terrific minibar. I looked like someone who hadn't slept in 24 hours. Puffy, glassy eyes made me wonder about the question, "Do you need help with your bags?" Then I received this email from Andy McLaughlin, president of PaperClip: “Dude, you’re at the wrong hotel.” Indeed. I was at a Grange, but Grange City Hotel was the site of the conference. At this point I felt doing anything right was becoming less likely, and was certain that when I opened my suitcase I would find clown clothes.

The conference, once I cabbed it from the Grange to the Grange (apparently the Brits have the same affliction as the Yanks: we can only think of so many names to call things), I was greeted warmly and my presentation was received.

Here are some of my takeaways from other speakers, notes I jotted down between fatigue-induced fits of wanting to giggle or cry. A friend of mine said I was experiencing menopause. I found myself having trouble regulating my body temperature. This confirmed her diagnosis.

Alex Connock, CEO, Ten Alps plc.
The guy buys companies. At least that was my impression. He came from a television background, and offered lots of fun pictures. OK, I was sitting in the back of the room with a seven-year old named Alex McLaughlin, a sunny-faced, spring-in-his-butt, iPod-wearing kid who had a terrific sense of humor. That is to say, he laughed at my jokes. His dad was the one who calls me “dude.” But Mr. Connock had some terrific insights and philosophies. In this phase of information creation and sharing and producing, “no one knows anything.” This was music to my ears. Finally, for the first time in my career, I feel like everyone has caught up with me. I have made a living out of not knowing anything. He had encouraging words for event developers: “Conferences are the sexiest sector of publishing. People want face to face meetings.” This was my first light bulb at the event (and by light bulb I mean "a learning moment"). In this age of virtual relationships and virtual everything, will all of us living our lives – both our first and our second – through computers, the basic tenants of business survive. I want to meet you, know you and, if I trust you, I want to do business with you. Connock put so much stock in this he said that a critical asset for the companies he buys is how well they understand their clients and can articulate their client relationships. Connock showed a number of internet TV, telly, or television channels his firm has created, signaling internet B2B television as something we all likely should, will or may want to consider developing. Like, for example, in the next ten minutes. The many images he had in his presentation were fun and stimulating. I, on the other hand, had a picture of a chimpanzee.

Speaking of primates, Phil Binkow, Financial Operations Networks LLC, took the theme of customer relationships another step further. He described during the course of launching his service that his firm interviewed 260 customers, with the interviewers applying an “enthusiasm rating.” He said audio programs, live events, certification services, etc., contributed to the community building in his market. It was during Phil’s presentation that I was in the throes of fatigue, fighting back tears and titters at the same time. No reflection on Phil’s content, more of a reflection on my own physical and mental limitations.
William Buist, Managing Director, Abelard Management Services and Coordinator, E-cademy Black Star members’ forum, is in the business of connecting business people. He sees his job as “helping people in the conversation.” The value in social networking he said is “what people say about you to people who don’t know you.” If what you offer is invaluable, people will say so. The Black Star service is a great example of what can only be described as premium social networking, where not just anyone can take part and join, which in itself makes me want to take part and join. Of course, letting me in will reduce my opinion of the service, but that’s a another story. It is a life members club, a group of like-minded individuals, that comes with a high price ticket. In the US we call that "being Republican." Buist stressed the importance of a vision for your community. Without it, the community is rudderless, I think he said.

Jem Stone, FM Portfolio Executive, BBC, surveyed the many blogs – the “too many” blogs – hosted by BBC. Stone was frank about the BBC’s efforts in this area, easily calling out what has worked and what hasn’t, and proudly sharing that BBC is not too proud to kill off a blog that isn’t doing well. His ability to be frank comes from the fact that a number blogs appear to be doing really, really well! He emphasized that creating good blogs and meaningful social networks is real work that requires real passion on the part of participants. He bristled at the comments of one blogger who, in his own blog, made the whole thing sound like obligatory shift work and a one-way chat with strangers. Bollocks! OK, he didn’t say that. I did. Just now. Must be the bangers and mash I had for breakfast? I just looked up the term, and apparently it's taboo. Really? Anyway . . . . Stone said the whole thing, the whole social networking thing, is not just creating a blog and walking away and hoping for the best. It’s a lot of work and the people who do it well actually care deeply about it. They don’t have to remember to file a blog entry, they are impelled to do so. He listed Technocrati and Bloglines as excellent tools for monitoring your firms in blogspace. I really liked one blog Stone illustrated. Rather than asking simply for a comment on blog entries, the invitation said “complain about this post.” Love it! He also said that if what you are creating is something like a discussion board, just don’t call it a blog.

Anthony Ray, Director, Stingray Research, said it is important to provide information that is extremely specific and has immediate and obvious value to the customer. He echoed the refrain about talking to your market and understanding their underlying motivations and emotions. “We talk to a lot of teachers,” he said. “Teachers want to feel in control. They gain emotional satisfaction when they feel in control. And they like to receive kudos.” His company helps meet those needs. He also felt what you call features is extremely important. “Don’t call it a chat room just because everyone else does,” he said. Or at least that’s what my notes say.

David Foster, president, Business Valuation Resources, LLC, had a lot of good stuff to say. I didn't write down any of it. He likes novels, for example. I was too busy trying to think of what I was going to say, or make my panel partner Jane Wilkinson, marketing director, Euromony Institutional Investor, laugh while David spoke. I glanced down at one point to see that Jane had written a few notes down about my presentation, “Shaking the Cushions for Coin: Finding Revenue in the Content Niches (pronounced “nitches”), but realized she was sitting where I was earlier in the day, and I had left my own speaker’s notes at the presenter’s table. I was admiring my own notes. David, please share with us a few insights here. You have many. And there is no need to mention my name and “animal eroticism” in the same presentation ever again. It was apparently misunderstood by many. When I got back to the Grange Holborn last night, there were three zebra having a smoke in my room saying they wanted a word with me. After a couple bottles of gin they calmed down. We even shared a few laughs. Exchanged email addresses. Promised to write, etc. Zebra are really jerks, by the way. I will no longer feel bad for them in documentaries about lions. Oh, I remember, David also recommended reading Wikinomics. I made a joke about downloading the audiobook, but accidentally purchased Wicca-nomics. Apparently jokes about making money from witchcraft just isn’t funny. Note to self.

PLEASE COMPLAIN ABOUT THIS POST.

Friday, June 15, 2007

Shaking the Cushions for Coin: A Preview of My Upcoming London Presentation

Here is advanced warning on some of what I will be discussing at the London SIPA meeting later this month.



SIPA UK Presentation
Tom Hagy
London June 2007


Title & Summary

Shaking The Cushions for Coin: Finding Revenue in the Content Cracks

• Developing High-Value Niche Content
• Leveraging the Information Lifecycle
• Slicing Content to Create New Products
• Driving Revenue through Repositioning & Improving Delivery

Biography

Tom Hagy is vice president at LexisNexis®, provider of Total Solutions for legal and corporate markets. Tom's role is to test and deliver new content solutions in often narrow market niches in alignment with customer needs and corresponding corporate initiatives. Starting out as a reporter covering legal topics in 1985, Tom moved from covering beats to helping decide what subjects customers needed his team to cover. Tom became managing editor and then publisher at Mealey Publications, which was acquired by LexisNexis®, a division of Reed-Elsevier, in 2000. Content responsibilities expanded beyond legal news to offering content in a variety of media. It is Tom’s role today to identify content solutions and deliver them in whatever media best suits the customer need. Content Tom has developed is delivered via online, email, podcast, RSS feeds, print, Web sites, and PDF, as well as via live events, Web cast and audio programs. He is editor of the SIPA U.S. blog. He served on the SIPA board of directors from 1998 to 2007, leaving his post as vice president to spend more time with his family. Tom lives with his wife and two teenage daughters in a suburb of Philadelphia. He continues to drum and watch way too much boxing. Don’t get him started.


Speaker Notes

Developing High-Value Niche Content

Gary Hoover, found of Hoover’s business information, recently said at the SIPA conference in Washington, DC that all the money is in the niches. He added that attendees should pay attention the word “specialized” in the name of our organization. He also said that everyone is looking but most are looking in all the wrong places. The concept of niche publishing, while not new to SIPA members, is worth revisiting just about every day. As companies grow they can become less satisfied with the revenues that a niche product might generate, or the time it takes to nurture a niche product and reap the rewards. Innovation guru Rosabeth Moss-Kanter said at another SIPA event recently that very few really big ideas started out that way. And yet, large companies tend to want new products that have the following attributes: guaranteed success, little investment, immediate returns, large revenues. There aren’t many great ideas that can meet those kinds of expectations.

Slicing Content to Create New Products

Thanks to technology, and thanks to the return of “content as king,” content creators can create products with little incremental investment. With the low investment can come an increase in the number of products you can offer. And with that, you can have “products,” or cuts of data that make very little revenue on their own, but when coupled with a number of other easy-to-create slices of data, start to add up. There may be a single large investment for you up front so your data are organized in a way that enables slicing into narrow offerings, but the investment will be a wise one if you have sufficient content. Once organized, not only can you offer slices, but you can offer them in a number of ways that satisfy the individual preferences of your readers. And, not only can you satisfy readers, you can use these slices to lure new readers.

What if a prospect comes to you with this statement: “I am generally interested in your subject area, but most of what you write is for a global audience, and my interest is just for what takes place where I live. Also, it’s often more information than I need. And, I don’t have much time during the day to read so I’d like to consume your data on my long train ride to work.”

Are you equipped to satisfy this prospect? Can you offer your data according to geography? What about the age of the reader and where they are in their career? What about their religion or race, or a fear or aspiration they have? What about a problem they are trying to solve or a task they are trying to perform? What about the lifestyle they lead? If you can carve data this way, you can create offerings that may not be big sellers in themselves, but add up in aggregate. Barry Parr of Jupiter Research, also speaking at SIPA’s recent conference, advised publishers to thing of content as data. I couldn’t agree more.


Leveraging the Information Lifecycle

Think of information, or its snooty cousin, knowledge, as something that evolves over time. We may wonder about the consequences of a potential change or event. Then, when that change or event becomes more of a possibility, we start to speculate, then when it looks like that change or event will actually transpire we start to anticipate and plan. Then when it happens we gather and absorb information, and then, as time passes and more context forms, we gain or seek an increasing understanding and clarity of what it means. Eventually the event or change becomes history, and from that we start to wonder what’s next.

Give thought to how you can serve your market along the way as ideas and information evolve and become more (or less) clear. A blog can be a great device for speculating, anticipating and gathering information, where a conference, or newsletter or book can be a great way to share a clearer understanding.

Conclusion

Finding and timing the right approach and vehicle – matched with the urgent and narrow needs of your market – is your challenge in finding coin in the cracks!

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Forced Free Trial: Torture?

I am not sure this qualifies as valid customer feedback, but at least one alleged enemy combatant being held at Guantanamo Bay included the forced reading of a newsletter among the instruments of physical and mental torture he is enduring. Other devices included unscented deodorants and shampoos. Odd how I find myself agreeing with this guy.

I used to open subscriber mail and can tell you, this is tame.

Read the news as only Fox can tell it: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,272492,00.html

There was no mention of cream rinses or bath beads, but then, the enemy combatant isn't me.

New SIPA President Looks for Larger Footprint


Strafford Publications founder and president Richard Osoff has succeeded Oakstone Publications' Nancy McMeekin (at left, obviously) as SIPA president, pledging not only to attract new specialized information enterprises, but to inspire involvement from greater numbers of people working for today's member companies.
Nancy enthusiastically and intelligently managed SIPA through a major transformation, acting as much like a CEO as any of our presidents. "Her leadership and dedication were inspiring," this blogger said to himself with no one there. "Richard will take the next step of securing greater involvement," I added. Evoking the name of the legendary and, some say, mythological mega-ped Sasquatch, Richard wants to see the strength and relevance of SIPA's offerings encourage more participation more deeply in member organizations.

"For those people in our member companies who don't attend a major meeting, about all the contact they have with us is Hotline," Richard wrote after the meeting. "So that means the sense of benefiting from membership is pretty much limited to conference attendees, a small number active in chapters, and some listserv users. I'd like us to have a bit broader base of advocates within member firms . . . or at least a broader base of people whose contact with SIPA is more tangible, in hopes that they will perceive (and hopefully communicate internally) a sense that they benefit from their company's membership."

"Easy to say, hard to do," said Mr. Osoff, who has a full board of talent chomping at the bit to build on recent progress in branding and offerings -- including the highly successful "New Rules" Conference this month.

If you have ideas or want to participate in building a better SIPA, please get engaged! There are many ways. Just ask.

SIPA Clips on YouTube

Andy McLaughlin of PaperClip has a way of cornering you on your way to get your seventh Diet Coke to ask you any question he has on his mind at that moment. This is nothing new. But now he is carrying around recording equipment. If I have done this right, the link below will show you where Andy posted brief interviews with Helen Hoart, Margie Weiner, Bruce Guzowski, Robin Crumby and yours truly in the halls of the Mayflower during SIPA's national meeting this month, sharing what we think, learned, or what we say we think but really learned from someone else but won't say who. Or whom. Robin posted these on the U.K. site. Well, all but mine. This bothers me only because I went out of my way to wear my new Web 2.0 glasses. Unfortunately, I forgot to not shave.

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=PaperClipComm

You will notice that the introduction to my clip is longer than anything I have to say. Interpret that how you like.

Tom

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Google Is Your Friend & Needs Great Content

Here are my edited notes from the session that ended minutes ago during SIPA's "New Rules" Conference held here in DC. Please pardon typos, fragments, etc. Much of this is direct quoting, or as close as I could paraphrase. This is NOT a transcript. Mr. Madden was a forthcoming and articulate speaker. --Tom Hagy

Andrew Madden
Strategic Partnership Development
Google
amadden@google.com


Google is your friend . . . I am here to speak about how to improve your visibility on Google. We want to communicate directly with content partners.

“Our mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” We are increasingly focused on offline content, so we can get access to it; this tends to be a pretty easy job as content owners see they are getting crawled and indexed. At first, we crawled what was available online. Since Google was founded about 10 years ago, we have seen dramatic change in the kinds of content we crawl and index, and kinds of content users are seeking. Users used to be satisfied with whatever was out there on sites, now they want biographies and documentaries. They want local and mapping information. These are the content types we have had to integrate. We are bringing books online to make them discoverable online online. We see the impact of video online is huge. We are unsure of what the next big innovation will be . . . .

The three key components of the Google business model. Users. Content. Advertisers. Users are the most important. “Google is not interested in being a content creator. We want to drive users to content creators. If a content creator wants to work with an advertiser we want to support that as well.” . . . .

The Internet highlighted the untapped potential on both the content and advertising side to reach smaller companies versus the large media companies and advertisers. It’s the “long tail.” “People are searching for everything. And Google helps content owners move down the tail.” Popular searches like "Harry Potter" are huge, but people also are searching "Peruvian Orchids" or "Jersey City." We won’t sell directly to you, but we will send you to Amazon or Borders . . . .

Now I will mention a few of our products "where we actually make money."

Key-word advertising. We are making an educated guess about what you are looking for as a searcher. We also offer ads in a syndicated format, so there are ads positioned on AOL and other sites. With syndicated content ads we load in contextually relevant links based on the content on a given page. See AdSense for Content. It is fully automated and fully self service . . . .

Improving Visibility on Google.com. The Google News Archive Search pulls from archival content. It is introduced as an index you’d find on Google News. Users can now take a deeper dive. They can refine searches by date and publication, or cluster results for similar topics.

If you, as a publisher, have paid content and the user hits the wall to register, our crawlier hits that same wall. Our crawlers are good but can’t get behind this. “With News Archive Search, we want full access to content behind the pay wall, driving more traffic. We kept advertising out of the mix for this relationship.” Good landing pages [e.g. with content] are great, bad pages [e.g. with walls] are death.

“To crawl firewall content some of it has to sit on our servers. We enter an agreement with providers to take the content down at anytime.”

We have dollar signs and amounts in search snippets. We give user the ability to make a decision to purchase. “User experience is important to us. If content is not labeled premium, and it is, they turn away from the bad experience.”

First Click Free. With this service the publisher let’s us in to full access to their content, so a Google searcher can intersect with fee content. “The searcher gets to consume the full text of one article. Once moving beyond that they hit the pay wall. Once in they can consume other content. Good for publishers who want to use teaser content or sell subscriptions. For news providers with a lot of content being posted throughout the day, it is a pretty compelling way to get people to your content.”

Another way is to use Google Web Master Tools. Submit a site map, inventory of site, add it to Google index. We know when you make updates. We can tell you what might be wrong with a page. We can provide detailed data. Help you to diagnose problems. Tell you which queries are most popular. We can do a much better job of accessing your site. It is simple to use. Powerful. Tells you what pages have errors, what pages are not found, which are blocking crawlers, timing out, or not reachable. Stuff publishers tend not to know. You can take down documents. Good self-service way to get Google to know what you are doing. Great for mobile devices. Provides a great way for content partners to push their content to us.

You can create shortcuts to content if you are a provider. iGoogle. For people with Google account. You can build modules around what is of interest to you. Personalized home page content modules. Same for toolbar.

Google Co-op helps users tailor their experience. Same for search. Some like broad general results. If you search Angelina Jolie, you can pick a source to appear first, e.g. People Magazine. I can subscribe to people.com. “When I get a search, having subscribed, those results appear at top of my search results.”

Custom search engine. Tailoring search results at your site, e.g. www.jumpup.com, from Intuit. There you see top business resources. Google custom search engine across a set of sources. Helps build community at site. Offers a better search experience. Highly targeted search engines can be assembled by your editors focusing on the URLs you want to focus on.

“The power of Google is the sources it searches.”


Question from this blogger: What prevents people from moving to the next hot search engine?

Answer: That is the fundamental question that we face at Google. How to keep people coming back. It is through content partnerships. Getting access to content that others can’t get access to. Something like archive searches. We look to hundreds of partners to allow us to use this content. What you can’t get elsewhere, like maps, YouTube . . . What we can add to our corpus of content that we can surface. Add more trusted, more respected, more useful content.

Don't Be Afraid and Other Tips From Winning Reporters

The following was submitted to the SIPA Blogger by Harry Baisden, SIPA Director of Publications, offering tips from winning specialized content reporters at today's (June 5) "New Rules" conference at the Mayflower Hotel.

Don't Be Afraid, Make Your Readers Winners and Other Tips from Winning Reporters

Washington, DC -- You’ve got to be tenacious…you need to know how old laws fit new realities, you’ve got to know what your readers want and need…you must learn to follow the daisy chain…you’d better be sure you KNOW the field you’re covering. Make these “have-to’s” your mantra and you, too, can be walking up to the podium at the annual International Newsletter & Specialized Information Conference to accept an award in Specialized Information Publishers Foundation’s journalism and marketing excellence competition. Five past award winners -- Carl Ayers and Jonathan Stern of UCG, Glenn Demby of Bongarde Media Co., George Lobsenz of The Energy Daily and Ellen Smith of Legal Publications Services -- talked about what it takes to get the award-winning story at a session of the 31st Annual International Newsletter & Specialized Information Conference in Washington today.


“You just can’t be intimidated,” Ayers said, pointing to the lawsuit threats he has received. “You’ve just got to stick with it.”


Demby’s award-winning efforts come from a different perspective. “We’re not a big breaking news organization,” he said. “Helping people in their business is our essence.” The political systems of the U.S. and Canada usually struggle to try to keep up with the changes in society, he said. It’s a newsletter’s job to help its readers learn how the old laws fit the changes in their industries.


Stern cautioned reporters and editors not to be so focused on “the story” they’re working on in an interview to miss tips that might point them to the trail of a whole new story. “A lot of reporters just don’t get the ‘listen’ part right.” Stern's breaking news coverage of the WorldCom collapse won him a first-place SIPF award three years ago.


Many stories come about of a long “daisy chain” of information that may not be easily recognizable at first, Lobsenz said. When you get a small piece of information that might start you down that daisy chain, it’s important to “act like you know more than you do and you’ll get even more information.”


“It’s one of the hardest things for a young journalist to realize how important it is to know the field they’re covering,” Smith said. She said there was no way she could have won the awards she has garnered in recent years when she first starting covering mine safety and health issues in the late 1980s. “People trust me and trust my knowledge,” she said. “They may not like me, but they know I’ll get the story right,” she said.

Monday, June 4, 2007

Hoover's Vision: Original Thinking for Business Success

Washington, DC -- In a non-stop machine-gun style keynote address here today, business visionary Gary Hoover offered what is arguably the most articulate summary of the opportunities and challenges for SIPA members. “All the money is in the niches,” he said. “The opportunities are everywhere everybody is not looking.”

There is no way I can adequately capture Hoover’s passion. But imagine somebody having a secret that would change the lives of millions. Don’t allow him to speak for a whole year. Then ask him to drink eight cups of black coffee. Then put him in front of a microphone. Then make sure your toupee is screwed down tight.

The guy loves what he does, and does love to share how he does what he does.

Addressing a packed ballroom at the historic Mayflower Hotel during the 31st Annual SIPA Conference, the founder of Hoover's business information offered eight characteristics leaders of great enterprises possess.

A Sense of Curiosity. “Curious people look for answers in unusual places,” he said. Personally he likes to look for answers that will be valid 20 years out. Talking to as many people as he can seems to be key to his success, commenting that on one speaking engagement he learned more from the limo driver than the CEO who invited him to speak.

A Great Sense of History. You must pay attention to the market needs and how they have shifted over time. The fact that we in the U.S. have a growing elderly population and a growing percentage of Latino and Asian citizens, as examples, have and continue to present many opportunities.

A Sense of Geography. “We all grew up somewhere and we are all shaped by it,” he said. You must get to know what shapes the people in your markets to better serve them. “Know where you are at a given juncture of space and time.” This will help you identify most compelling opportunities.

A Clear Vision.

A Certain Vision.

A Unique Vision.

A Consistent Vision.


Hoover cited Southwest Airlines as one enterprise that scores well on vision.

“They get you on the plane fast, tell a joke, throw you some peanuts and take off!” Target is another company that is blowing the doors off competition by truly focusing on what their customers want. Sears is one company that lost its vision, he believes. They went into financial markets and built a tall building, he said. “They really took their eye off the customer.”

He said companies exist for one thing, and that is to “sell goods and services to people.” When you start saying your goal is to make money, you are headed down the wrong path. “Being measured isn’t the goal of a company.”

Passion. “No one ever built a company by not loving what they were doing.” He said if you don’t like what you’re doing, just get out.

He offered that you can learn from any type of enterprise (so study them), that you should talk eye-to-eye with customers as often as possible, and constantly look for opportunities where others are not.

Gary Hoover founded Hoovers business information. He also founded BOOKSTOP, which later sold to Barnes & Noble for $41.5 million. He is the author of "Hoover’s Vision."

Sunday, June 3, 2007

Think of 'Webs' Not Sites, Content as Data & Hang With The Kids


Washington, DC -- The way to succeed in the world of Web 2.0 is to think less about building Web sites and more about building your “web” -- the many ways you can lead Internet traffic to your content and your site by connecting your data (i.e. content) to other data being eyeballed on the Internet.

This was the advice shared this afternoon by Barry Parr, Senior Media Analyst at JupiterResearch. Parr gave an enlightening overview on “where information is headed” in the ballroom of the Mayflower Hotel during the 31st Annual SIPA Conference here in DC.

Here is a quick recap of Parr’s insights, roughly in the order he presented them, and almost certainly with typos, disjointed prose and plenty of tasty non sequitur for you to ridicule (I am glad I could be here for you).

Parr said online growth is starting to flatten. If I captured the slide right, there are 200M users expected in 2011, compared to 60M in 2001, but user-generated content is increasing. Readers of blogs, for example, doubled in 2006 over 2005. Ad sales are growing at 10 percent a year. Content relating to personal ads and entertainment lead the way. Video and audio are building in popularity and promise to be a big part of the Web’s future.

In the traditional Internet, we all went for rapid growth, increasing audience size, greater ad inventory. We looked for increased revenue, invented production techniques, converted our traditional audience to the Web, expected startups and new entrants. We served unsophisticated users.

Make Them Stay

In the Web 2.0 environment, he said, we work with small staffs and little investment, marketing our sites through word of mouth, not ads. We are moving to increased intensity of use, page yields, more sophisticated users, looking for cost control, using existing production techniques. We pursue online users, rethink the organization and anticipate consolidation.

We see companies buying companies and helping them grow within their organizations, Parr said. The trick now is “getting people to spend more time on your web site.”


People Formerly Known As the Audience

Borrowing a phrase from a former colleague at the San Jose Mercury Times, Parr referred to “the people formerly known as the audience.” Now they are getting involved.

“One-third of people on the Web are creating content somehow. Another 20 percent read the content. Another 50 are not participating at all.” Parr said there is opportunity in those numbers.

If you have a population coming to your service, anticipate 10 percent of people to participate in the beginning, he said, but expect growth if you do it right. “We are turning into a nation of content creators in a way that may have been impossible to imagine even five years ago.”

Younger users are far and away more interested in creating content. Three quarters of 18 to 24-year olds are creating content on the web. More than half of the 25 to 34 crowd are creators or readers.

Good Sites

Want to see a site Parr likes? Go to http://www.yelp.com/, where people comment on the local services where they live. Just knowing that someone likes a service isn’t enough, so the user profiles help you understand what people like you like.

Parr also likes http://www.linkedin.com/. So did many in the audience. While it’s a great professional network, it also is a good source of information, he added.

Another site is http://www.glam.com/. While just “okay,” it has a huge distribution network and, according to Parr, is “the fastest growing site in Media Metrics 100, and one of the fastest growing content sites ever, because of the understanding of the distribution model, making it work, and superior networking.”

Redesign Reviled, But Effective!

Parr noted that USA Today executed a major redesign of its site in March. Traditional users reviled the new look, even though it put user-generated content front and center, an unusual feature for newspapers. Admitting he’s not a fan of the makeover, Parr said USA Today nearly doubled the rate of pages viewed per visit, moving the needle from 2.5 to 6.5! That is not an easy number to increase, Parr said, and other papers have tried this only to crash-land due to crazy, stupid and even hateful posts.

“Creating communication on a site requires a lot of hard work and cultivation and editorial control,” Parr warned. “Editors are used to thinking that products they create come at the end of a long process. They believe that on the Internet ‘everybody is an idiot and post garbage,’” Parr said. “They should realize there is a middle ground.”

Parr’s recommendations to the audience:

Ø Start participating in online communities.
Ø Plan now for reader participation.
Ø Determine whether social networking makes sense for you.
Ø Learn how to nurture and moderate the community.
Ø Start a list of features you need from your content management software. Keep track of what you see that you like. Monitor other publishers.
Ø Think in terms of solutions, not features. Before saying “we really want to do a wiki,” first figure out what you want it to do and what problems you are trying to solve.
Ø Prepare to work. “Communities are hard to maintain and with no plan building one could be a disaster.”

Develop a Web, Not a Site

Parr said most people consider Web 2.0 as community content creation or interactive Web sites. While those are components, he said publishers should focus on developing “a Web and not a site,” then thriving on mediating that community.

“At a newspaper we always wanted to control the customer, and if someone got between us and the company we got uncomfortable,” he said. “Getting used to intermediation is difficult for publishers to do.”

Parr showed one video clip that was recorded by CNN, then posted on YouTube by several individuals, then cited by two blogs, and finally fed to him through Google Reader. “That is three levels of intermediates between the user and CNN,” he noted. “That will get deeper and broader as time goes on.”

All The Kids Are Doing It

Young users prefer to get their news from portals, Parr said, followed by cable news, then broadcast news sites, then their ISP. Local newspaper sites are at the bottom. Parr said he expects the 18-to-34 crowd -- 60% of which prefer portal-fed news -- to continue this preference. Portals don’t generate news, yet most people trust portals just as much as traditional sources of news, Parr explained. Many paid news models aren’t working right now, but mostly because these sites are not taking advantage of a lot of potential traffic. For some sites as much as half of their traffic is coming from intermediate giant Google.

But how does a publisher compete? Get stories on other publishers’ sites, use syndication like RSS, work with aggregators, get affiliates to buy your content and redistribute it. Join social networks, start an online forum, figure out what features help your users solve problems, start using feedburners and track activity. "Don’t get distracted by buzzwords," Parr cautioned. You don’t need to have a wiki if a wiki doesn’t make sense for your community. Finally, think about who your distribution partners are, both upstream and downstream, and seek partnerships.

Data Are King?

“Treat content as data,” Parr said, and “think about how you want your WEB to look.” An example of the importance of seeing “content as data in a web,” he noted that a most-viewed story recently on http://www.wsj.com/ was two years old. Why? Because it was mentioned by a popular blog as a valuable piece on investments. A great story, but how can you make this happen? Parr’s suggestion for how to develop relationships with bloggers: treat them like traditional journalists. Reach out to them, give them quotes, and share statistics they can use. (I would add: flatter them, refer to them in ways they will find out, and, if you ever meet them, make sure you dress exactly like them. Bloggers dig that.)

A note for us text-based publishers: “Video is going to be a big part of the net, and a big piece of the use of video will be on the net.”

Can we be over-protective with our content? Apparently so. “Digital Rights Management is a bad idea. It is a disaster for the end user,” Parr said. “I am not saying it is inappropriate in all cases, but you need to think about the impact on the end user when you do it.”

Tiny Bubbles

Finally, Parr told this blogger (I always wanted to say that) that he attended the recent Web 2.0 conference in San Francisco. He described the mood there as “very bubbly,” likening it to the atmosphere in year 2000 around the swelling Internet bubble.

“There was a lot of excitement with a lot of buzzwords and hype,” he said, “and that concerns me.”

The buzz after Mr. Parr's session was extremely positive. It was an excellent presentation and just right for SIPA attendees. Here is his email address if you would like to reach him:
bparr@jupiterresearch.com.

SIPA Board Highlights

The SIPA Board met this morning and I am sure I would be pelted with more than one margarine patty if I wrote about everything discussed there. Not because it's a secret, but because I don't think anyone wants you to know just how boring we can be.

One thing that is not dull is the progress we are making in reforming our association to better support the changing needs of information professionals. SIPA embarked on a strategic planning project two years ago this month and we are starting to see some solid signs that we are on the right track. While new membership remains a challenge, that is partially intentional. The Board felt it needed to ensure that SIPA should first firm up its offerings for our non-traditional prospects before actually pushing a heavy recruitment program. Now that many elements of our plan are in place we're ready to go. Again, early signs look good. We heard one report that a very large publisher who used to pass on participation in a newsletter-only association sees the newly directed SIPA as one that is relevant and on target with its business goals.

The "Welcome to The New Rules" Conference which began this morning -- chaired by in-coming SIPA VP Wayne Cooper -- has 625 attendees, up from 571 last year. Today's workshops, one a SIPA "bootcamp" and the second a usability session, drew a combined 92 attendees. We have 32 exhibitors, 21 of which are return vendors and 11 new vendors. Great to see so many coming back and so many new faces. We have strong international attendance this year, with a particularly strong German contingent from GVNR, including that company's Helmut Graf, also a SIPA board member.

There was much discussion around building more of an online social network for SIPA. This blog is just one aspect of that. I also found out that the U.K. has had a blog since 1876 or so, and I look forward linking to that forum from this one (apologies to the word "forum").

But more importantly, the M&Ms have returned to the registration desk. Their absence may have impacted previous attendance, market research suggests.

I understand there is a new beverage with our name on it, The SIPA Pearl, but no reviews yet on its deliciousness compared to, say, the SIPA Snowcone, SIPA Pâté and the short-lived SIPA Pâté - Snowcone Combo.

Get What You Want

In case you think attending any SIPA event is anything like sitting through high-school algebra (which I enjoyed sitting through during the summers as well), it's NOT.

To get the most out of SIPA events -- including "Welcome to the New Rules" chaired by Wayne Cooper and kicked off this morning -- come prepared with what YOU want to learn. Sure, listen to the experts, but take a few minutes and jot down the 5-10 things you MUST learn at this meeting to help you in your profession. If you don't hear answers from speakers, chase them down in the hallways, network at lunch, and by all means, make random calls to hotel rooms. You can't swing a cat around the Mayflower right now without hitting someone who has an answer for you. That actually happened in 1989. We don't like to talk about it.

Saturday, June 2, 2007

Memo Morte?

When I was six months old, Elvis Presley received his U.S. Army draft notice. That same year Wham-O introduced a cool new toy called the Pluto Platter, later renamed the Frisbee. A guy in Massachusetts began selling lawn flamingoes. Ford introduced the Edsel. The preferred written business communication was called the “memorandum.” I know these things because that’s what it said on the birthday card my 16-year-old daughter gave me. Except the part about the memorandum. On that score I am making a thoughtless assumption in order to write a compelling opening statement. This is a blog, after all. Aren’t I allowed to be loose with the facts? (See upcoming blog entry: “This is a Blog. Aren’t I Allowed to be Loose with the Facts?”)

Of the things listed above only the Frisbee and flamingoes survive today. We all know what happened to Elvis: he faked his death and started a random tour of convenience stores and gas stations, then cloned himself by the thousands. And the Edsel: it was horribly unpopular and discontinued after two years and we have been reminiscing about it ever since. This is similar to how we treat presidents. And now, the memorandum, while not dead, is at least on life support, replaced by PowerPoints and what can only be characterized as an incessant spewing of every typo-ridden, half-baked, knee-jerk, caffeine fueled, BlackBerry or laptop manufactured “document” we have come to know as “e-mail.”

“Eek! mail” would be a more appropriate name for the fear it all strikes in me. For some reason I even object to putting an “e” for electronic ahead of “mail.” Do we have to now call mailbox mail p-mail? If carried out to other inventions, it would mean we’d be finding our way in the dark with e-candles, typing on e-writers, computing on e-thinkers, and talking to each other through e-cups and e-strings. But there I go, getting up on my high e-horse. Because of the ease with which we can spout off and share our brilliance, I now have 786 emails in my in-box. And very few of those could be characterized as thought-through. Rather, they are bits and pieces sent to me like a 786-piece toy that requires assembly. And don’t think I am not part of the madness. I am. But I’d like to do something about it.

I propose an international moment of silence before hitting send on any e-mail. During this meditative moment ask yourself: Should I just call? Have I thought this through? Do I even know what I am saying? Should I take more time and more fully develop my thought in, say, a memorandum? More importantly, what’s that on my nose? Why do I know so much about Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton? Have I ever seen the Queen Mother dance? Why is it that skunks are associated with severe intoxication?

More later. Can’t I stop mid-stream and complete this thought later? This is a blog after all. (See upcoming post: Can’t I Stop Mid-